Insight,

COVID-19 and Hong Kong corporate law

24 April 2020

Our People
HK | EN
Current site :    HK   |   EN
Australia
EN |
China
JP | ZH | EN |
China Hong Kong SAR
ZH | EN |
Japan
JP | ZH | EN |
Singapore
ZH | EN |
United States
EN |
Global
ZH | EN |

This article was written by Neil Carabine, Gary Lock, Ike Kutlaca and Eugene Lau.

COVID-19 presents a huge challenge for business in Hong Kong.

In this article, we examine the impact on Hong Kong corporate law and recommend strategies for listed and private companies during these difficult times.

COVID-19 and Hong Kong corporate law

  • We have already seen major Hong Kong companies cancelling shareholder meetings due to the unavailability of appropriate video conferencing capabilities 
  • Companies must urgently ensure directors and shareholders can continue to hold meetings and pass resolutions – companies should be quickly reviewing (and amending, if required) their articles of association and any shareholder or joint venture agreement to ensure board and shareholder meetings by teleconference and video conference are permitted (and if appropriate, that circulating resolutions can be used) 
  • Similarly, directors should consider forming a board committee to deal with COVID-19 impacts, and key management should be regularly communicating with directors and shareholders to ensure they remain fully informed
  • We have also noticed some companies publicly stating they will no longer honour contractual commitments (like obligations to pay rent) – while this may be a clever negotiating tactic, there is a world of difference legally between saying "we don't think we can pay" and "we won't pay", with the latter likely to be a repudiation of the contract that leaves the repudiating party exposed to significant claims for damages – companies should work with their:
    • contractual counterparties, to renegotiate or terminate agreements in accordance with law
    • legal advisors, to determine if the company may be released from contractual obligations due to frustration or a force majeure or material adverse change (MAC) clause
  • Similarly, COVID-19 will force companies to reduce staffing – but employment law is complex and highly regulated in Hong Kong – to reduce risks of future claims, getting proper legal advice before making changes to employment is strongly recommended
  • Companies will need to consider appointing replacement signatories (for contracts or bank accounts) if directors or employees are unable to reach ordinary working locations because of travel bans or illness
  • Management of companies who expect unsolicited takeover offers should prepare takeover defences (assuming the shareholders would be hostile) or prepare for the sale process (if the shareholders are supportive) – since nobody can say when the COVID-19 impacts will subside, the best action for boards and management of likely takeover targets is to start preparing now
  • We expect to see delays in applications for renewal of licences as the Hong Kong government continues its work from home programme – for critical licence renewals, companies are advised to start the process early
  • With staff working from home, at least some ordinary audit controls are likely to be relaxed or bypassed, and increased errors or fraud will occur (and, with work from home being somewhat similar to ordinary audit leave, historic frauds are also likely to be uncovered) – companies should increase vigilance and work closely with their auditors where ordinary practices have been changed

Special considerations for listed companies

  • Investors may expect that COVID-19 will impact the financial performance of listed companies – but the extent of such impact may not be accurately understood, so directors must carefully form a view as to whether there is a particular impact of COVID-19 on the listed entity which is not appreciated by the market
  • Pulling earnings guidance isn't enough, listed companies must consider disclosures for operational and strategic impacts of COVID-19, including for major:
    • supply chain disruptions
    • closures of offices of other facilities
    • losses of employee hours or productivity
    • disruptions from travel restrictions
    • lack of access to financial markets
    • drawdowns on available facilities
  • Directors should also review historical forward-looking statements, and issue corrections where required. Particular attention should be made to the "No Material Adverse Changes" confirmation in circular and consider whether any carve-outs should be made
  • Hong Kong-listed companies, especially those with significant operations in China, Europe or the USA, may struggle to produce audited accounts and other required filings within the required timelines.  For these companies (Impacted Companies), the Hong Kong SFC and HKEX jointly released guidance notes in February and March 2020 which provide that:
    • Impacted Companies should consult the HKEX as early as possible and explain how and why travel and other restrictions have impinged upon their ability to meet reporting deadlines
    • if an Impacted Company with a financial year end of 31 December 2019 can issue either a preliminary results announcement (without agreement with its auditors), or an announcement containing its management accounts, on or before 31 March 2020, trading of its shares will normally not be suspended
    • an Impacted Company may delay the publication of its annual report for a period of 60 days from 16 March 2020, provided that a preliminary results announcement without agreement with its auditors, or the management accounts, are published on or before by 31 March 2020
  • The blackout period for trading in an Impacted Company will continue until audited financial statements (or an announcement confirming that the released results have now been agreed with the company's auditors) has been published.  Impacted Companies should consider sending internal notes to all of their directors and senior management reminding them of the dealing restrictions during the blackout period
  • That said, as the financial results of an Impacted Company must be laid out at the AGM for that company – Hong Kong-incorporated Impacted Companies should additionally note that the Hong Kong Companies Ordinance requires listed companies to hold their AGMs, and directors to lay the issuer's annual financial statements at its AGM, within six months after the end of the financial year.  The HKEX and SFC will not relax this AGM requirement
  • For companies incorporated in any other jurisdictions, the HKEX may consider applications to delay the AGM to a date which is more than six months after the end of the financial year on a case by case basis
  • Companies must urgently consider the format of AGMs. While the Hong Kong government has confirmed that the Prevention and Control of Disease (Prohibition on Group Gathering) Regulation does not apply to AGMs, companies should still consider the format of the AGMs. The Hong Kong SFC and HKEX jointly released a joint statement in April 2020 which provides that issuers should:
    • monitor how the current situation develops in order to better decide how to manage the potential health risks of a physical meeting (if one is needed); and
    • explore and assess measures permissible under the laws of their jurisdictions of incorporation and their constitutional documents to reduce the need for physical attendance, including the use of technology, encouraging voting by proxy and encouraging shareholders to limit the number of questions during AGMs.
  • Key executives remunerated by reference to KPIs will push to have their remuneration adjusted – leaving remuneration committees with the unenviable balancing act of retaining key staff while cutting costs – boards should start considering this point now
Categories

MEET THE AUTHORS

LATEST THINKING
Publication
Hong Kong Extends the Green and Sustainable Finance Grant Scheme
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (the “HKMA”) has extended its Green and Sustainable Finance Grant Scheme (the “GSF Grant Scheme”) for an additional three years, through 2027. Initially launched in May 2021, the GSF Grant Scheme supports the issuance of eligible green and sustainable bonds and loans in Hong Kong to foster the development of sustainable finance. The details of the extended GSF Grant Scheme were announced on 3 May 2024, with the updated guidelines for grant applications (the “2024 Updated Guidelines”) taking effect on 10 May 2024, the date of the extension. As with the original GSF Grant Scheme, the grants under the extended GSF Grant Scheme continue to consist of two tracks, covering: • General Bond Issuance Costs: This track covers 50% of eligible expenses with the caps maintained at either HK$2.5 million or HK$1.25 million (depending on whether the bond, issuer, or guarantor has a credit rating). • External Review Costs: This track covers the full cost of external review fees with an overall cap maintained at HK$800,000. The eligibility requirements are similar to those under the original GSF Grant Scheme, requiring, among others, the financial instruments to be issued in Hong Kong, the issuance size to be at least HK$1.5 billion for bond issuance cost grants or HK$100 million for external review cost subsidies, and a pre-issuance review by a recognised external reviewer. The key changes in the 2024 Updated Guidelines include: 1 Expansion of the Grant Scope: Transition bonds and loans have been added as eligible financial instruments. 2 Specific Caps for External Review Costs: Sub-caps for pre-issuance and post-issuance external review cost have been set on top of the original total cap. Applications for grants for bonds or loans issued from 10 May 2024 must follow the 2024 Updated Guidelines. The application procedure remains the same as in the original GSF Grant Scheme, where applications for bond issuance costs grants are to be submitted to the HKMA by the lead arrangers or lead lenders while applications for external review costs grants may be submitted by issuers or borrowers directly. Recognised arranger and recognised external reviewer statuses certified by the HKMA before 10 May 2024, will remain valid. Overview of the Hong Kong GSF Grant Scheme For easy reference, the below is an overview of the updated GSF Grant Scheme. For full details on the GSF Grant Scheme, please refer to the 2024 Updated Guidelines. 1. Eligible Instrument Types General Bond Issuance Costs Grant: Green, social, sustainability, sustainability-linked and transition bonds. External Review Costs Grant: Green, social, sustainability, sustainability-linked and transition bonds and loans. 2. Eligible Bond Issuers and Loan Borrowers General Bond Issuance Costs Grant: Eligible for first-time issuers who have not issued any green, social, sustainability, sustainability-linked, or transition bonds in Hong Kong within the five years preceding the eligible issuance, excluding such issuer acting as an arranger for the eligible bond issuance. External Review Costs Grant: Available to both first-time and repeated issuers and borrowers (each entity can apply for subsidy for two eligible loans at most ). 3. Criteria for Eligible Issuances For all applications: • Issued in Hong Kong: For bonds, at least half of the lead arrangers must have recognized arranger status by HKMA, and for loans, at least half of the loan amount must be provided by Hong Kong-based lenders. • Issuance Size: At least HK$1.5 billion for the bond issuance costs grant and HK$100 million for the external review costs grant. Applicable to bonds only: • Must be (i) lodged with and cleared by the Central Moneymarkets Unit (“CMU”) or (ii) listed on The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited (the “HKEX”). • Issued, at issuance, to at least 10 persons, or fewer than 10 persons none of whom is an associate of the issuer. Applicable to green, social responsibility, and sustainability bonds and loans only: • pre-issuance external review related to the issuance demonstrating alignment with internationally-recognised principles, standards or guidance, as provided by a recognised external reviewer. Applicable to transition bonds and loans: • a developed and appropriately disclosed transition plan (or equivalent disclosures on climate transition strategy) at the entity-level . • pre-issuance external review demonstrating the adoption of internationally-recognised transition finance principles, standards or guidance (including the transition plan related elements under such principles, standards or guidance), as provided by a recognised external reviewer; and • for use-of-proceeds instruments, pre-issuance external review demonstrating alignment with an applicable internationally-recognised taxonomy, as provided by a recognised external reviewer. 4. Grant Amounts General Bond Issuance Costs Grant: 50% of eligible expenses (ie. fees to Hong Kong-based arrangers, Hong Kong-based legal advisors, Hong Kong-based auditors and accountants, Hong Kong-based rating agencies, HKEX listing fees and CMU lodging and clearing fees) up to the following caps: • HK$2.5 million where the bond, its issuer or its guarantor(s) possess a credit rating ; or • HK$1.25 million where no credit rating is available. External Review Costs Grant: Transaction-related fees paid to recognised external reviewers for up to a total cap of HK$800,000, further divided into specific caps as follows: • Pre-issuance external review (such as fees paid for certification, second-party opinion, verification, ESG scoring/rating, assurance): up to HK$250,000; and • Post-issuance external review: HK$200,000 per year for the first three years from the date of the eligible issuance or up until the maturity of the issuance, whichever is shorter.

14 May 2024

Publication
What offshore investors need to know about the relaunch of China’s voluntary carbon market
Voluntary carbon markets (VCMs) have an important role to play in supporting the transition to a low-carbon economy. Carbon credits are used to offset a corresponding volume of greenhouse gas emissions.

19 April 2024

Insight
Swap connect: NAFMII publishes cleared derivatives agreement
China’s National Association of Financial Market Institutional Investors (“NAFMII”) recently published its much-anticipated Swap Connect Cleared Derivatives Agreement (“SCCDA”) , which is designed to further facilitate Northbound Trading under Swap Connect. Pursuant to the SCCDA, an onshore Swap Connect participant and an offshore Swap Connect participant agree to take reasonable steps to enable a Northbound Swap Connect derivatives transaction (“Swap Connect Transaction”) to be centrally cleared. Significantly, the SCCDA documents the parties’ election of “cancellation” as the mutually agreed method under applicable Swap Connect rules for dealing with a transaction that is rejected for central clearing. The SCCDA expressly provides that under the cancellation method, a transaction that is rejected for clearing is void ab initio and no amount is payable by either party in respect of a rejected transaction. The SCCDA also contains an Annex that provides the parties with the flexibility to select the SCCDA’s governing law, dispute resolution mechanism and how it interacts with any existing master derivatives agreement between the parties. This article provides a high-level overview of key provisions of the SCCDA and their significance in the context of Swap Connect.

16 April 2024

EXPLORE LATEST THINKING
OUR PEOPLE
LOCATIONS
MEDIA CENTRE
CAREERS
ABOUT US
Explore Our Expertise
Explore insights
Explore Our Insights

Advertising and Targeting Cookies